Posts Tagged ‘Republicans’

Death Panel

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

Stei091222

The Republicans are nothing if not united in their opposition to anything the Democrats try. In the case of health care reform, their stance from the beginning has been to kill it at all costs. It’s an outrage that it takes 60 votes in the Senate to accomplish anything when the minority party is unanimously hostile to the majority party. We can argue the merits of this particular health care bill forever, but that’s never really been the point of the opposition. If it were, the Republican party would have been trying to make the bill better rather than scuttle it. They argue that they’ve been shut out of the process, but that’s not even close to the truth. Little they’ve offered has been constructive, and nothing they’ve proposed even comes close to solving the problems our current non-system of health care presents to tens of millions of Americans. As the old saying goes, if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Sadly, the GOP has indicated that it will fight granting more Americans access to affordable health care all the way.

Trial and Terror

Monday, November 16th, 2009

Stei091116

Finally, the 9/11 conspirators are going to have their day in court. What an uproar has been unleashed by Attorney general Eric Holder’s decision to allow  Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his followers to be tried in a civilian court in the United States. The very idea that we at long last are returning to a bedrock American tradition–a trial by jury–in the prosecution of the alleged criminals who attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon has Obama’s critics foaming at the mouth. It will endanger the citizens of New York, it will be a recruiting tool for al Qaeda, these guys are warriors who don’t deserve a civilian trial, what if they’re acquitted?–and on and on.

I’d like to believe that most of these arguments are purely political, that if the Democrats were arguing against giving these men a fair trial, they would be accused of not having faith in the American system of justice. I’d like to believe that, and not that the Republicans have lost their moorings in the war on terror and their relentless campaign of fear-mongering. One thing is certain: torture will come up in these trials, and the Bush administration and their Congressional enablers will be embarrassed once again. In the end, though, most of the world will admire an America that has regained the courage to live up to its principles. The ones who hate us and our way of life will be unmoved, no matter what we do. Let the trials begin.

Pandemic

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

Stei091103

It now looks likely that Obama will be able to sign some version of comprehensive health care reform by the end of the year. There are still numerous hurdles to leap, but the momentum appears to have built to the point that the discussion is about what the bill will contain rather than whether it will survive. Obama’s relative silence during the summer while his opponents were loudly disrupting town hall meetings and the tea party crazies were having their fun may have been the smartest strategy, after all. I was not alone in worrying that the president was letting the protesters get the upper hand, but it may have been his version of the rope-a-dope, letting the opposition wear itself out while cooler and more patient heads worked steadily to build the necessary popular support to pass meaningful legislation.

There’s no doubt that the vast majority of Americans want this reform; poll after poll shows a strong preference for finally correcting this country’s shameful inability to guarantee all its citizens access to affordable health care. The bills wending their way through both houses of Congress are not perfect, by any means, but they are a start in the right direction. History shows that once a framework is put in place, the necessary fixes will be made in time.

It’s not a done deal yet, but I’m more hopeful than ever that, at long last, this nation will join all the other countries of the developed world in making access to health care a basic human right for its citizens.

Peace Prize

Friday, October 9th, 2009

Stei091009

I suppose, given the toxic climate of Washington these days, that it was too much to ask that everyone in America celebrate, at least for a day, an American winning a Nobel Prize. One can certainly debate whether the surprise Peace Prize awarded to President Obama was a bit premature, based more on expectation than accomplishment. That, of course, was not the official Republican response, delivered by party chairman Michael Steele. He went back to the pre-election playbook, the one that worked so well for the GOP in November, referring to Obama’s rock star status around the world as the reason for the award. Once again, the Republican party challenged, not the president’s policies, but his legitimacy. In his remarks, he claimed that Obama had yet to accomplish anything. This is the height of hypocrisy, given that the Republican party has done everything it can to prevent Obama from achieving any of his goals, no matter how worthy.

I’d argue that Obama has done a great deal on the world stage. He has moved this country back into its traditional role, abandoning the ruinous go-it-alone policies that alienated us from our allies and prevented us from making diplomatic progress with our enemies. His performance at the United Nations and at the G-20 summit restored much of the confidence, lost during eight years of American exceptionalism that marked the Bush era, that we intend to keep our place as the leader of the free world.

Mobocracy in Action

Friday, August 7th, 2009

stei090807

The GOP-encouraged, right wing media-inflamed, health care industry-funded mobs engaged in shouting down Democratic congressmen and Senators at town hall meetings presents us with a new low from a party I thought couldn’t sink any deeper. The goal, of course, is to defeat health care reform by drowning out the support with a wall of noise.

It’s hard to understand exactly what enrages these people. Yes, they’ve been fed a steady diet of misinformation about the proposed reform–told that this is a government takeover of health care (it’s not), that it’s socialism (no), that it’s a step toward single payer (not even close), that people will lose their ability to choose their own doctor (as if they actually had that)– but something else is stoking the fury. Some of it, I suspect, is lingering resentment over losing the election, some of it is fueled by the covert racism underlying the Birther movement, and much of it is fear of change fed by Republicans who simply wish to hand Obama a defeat and by the insurance and drug industries that don’t want any change in their cash flow. As usual, they’ve managed to persuade a lot of people to oppose their own self interest

The unholy alliance of the health care industry and their Republican enablers offer nothing but a return to the status quo that has shut tens of millions out of access to health care. And they’re doing it with a disgusting return to the ugly, divisive politics that were so thoroughly repudiated by the Obama election.

Take a Hike

Monday, June 29th, 2009

stei090629

Is it finally time for the Republican Party to give up its “family values” crusade? Have there been enough scandals yet to persuade the holier-than-thou bunch that they have no moral authority to preach to the rest of us? The hypocrisy of South Carolina Governor Mark “Impeach Bill Clinton” Sanford is breathtaking, but no more audacious than Newt Gingrich’s finger-pointing at Clinton while Newt was shacking up outside his own marriage. And while we’re at it, if you’re unable to control your own sexual appetites, maybe it’s a good idea not to bash gays and lesbians for wanting a monogamous relationship. In fact, why don’t you stay out of the sexual morality business entirely, and let all of us handle our own personal ethics? Is that too much to ask? Unfortunately, given recent experience, it probably is.

A Little Empathy

Friday, May 29th, 2009

stei090529

I’ve grown increasingly tired of the fights over Supreme Court nominees. No matter who the current occupant of the White House names, you can be sure there will be strident objections from the opposing party. Too conservative, out of the mainstream, too liberal, a judicial activist, a sexist, a racist, etc., etc. Oh, sure, there are always unexpected nuances. Who ever thought that empathy would be regarded as such a negative trait. Do we really want our justices to feel nothing other than reverence for the text–bloodless automatons in service to nothing other than ferreting out the meaning of 200-plus year-old writing? But I digress. This is just a sideshow, the thing the opponents have glommed on to this go-round. It might have been anything, just whatever was necessary to drum up the proper level of contempt for the nominee. 

I ran this idea past my good friend Scott Stantis, the cartoonist for the Birmingham News, and he took exception to the portrayal of the GOP as firmly against the nomination. He claims that the conservative blogosphere is relatively mild in its criticism, and that I’m unfairly demonizing the opposition–exactly what I’ve criticized conservative cartoonists for doing in the past. This is always a tough call. What I’ve heard is Newt Gingrich calling Sotomayor a racist for an offhand comment made in a speech years ago, others claiming that she’s a radical leftist and a judicial activist, Republican members of the Senate saying they had a duty to prevent the nomination of such a radical from coming to a vote (wasn’t it just a few years ago that we heard Republicans demanding that every nominee deserves an up or down vote on the floor of the Senate?). Perhaps Scott is right and he reads and hears things more nuanced than I do, but I decided to go with the cartoon anyway.

Besides, it’s fun to draw torture chambers, and it’s only a matter of time before even I have to give up blasting the previous administration for its policies.

Harsh Interrogation

Saturday, May 9th, 2009

stei090509

The spectacle of the GOP doing everything it possibly can to derail any inquiry into the interrogation practices of the Bush administration is truly stomach-churning. They bounce from denying that the things the Bush administration authorized were torture, to claiming that anything the president authorized was by definition legal, to claiming that torture worked to protect us, to simultaneously claiming that revealing the truth would imperil national security and demanding that everything be an open book, to claiming that everyone knew all about it anyway.  

Meanwhile, the Obama administration, fearing that the partisan war any investigation and prosecution would likely produce will derail the president’s agenda, would just as soon the whole thing thing went away. 

Sorry, folks, this is something we have to do. This country lost its ethical bearings after 9/11, and we must find out who did what and why. To sweep this dark chapter in our history under the rug, as tempting as that may be, would be the worst thing we could do. We have to know what happened, or we are forever at risk of repeating it in the future. If we truly are who we say we are as a nation, we must stand for those things we claim to believe in–and chief among them is the belief that only an open society unafraid of the truth can lead the way to a just and ethical world.

Goodbye

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

stei090429

One of the last remaining moderate Republicans,  Senator Arlen Specter finally called it quits and joined the other party. One could hardly blame him. Facing a strong conservative challenger, he was likely to lose in the primary to a man far to his right, who then most likely would have been defeated in a Democratic-leaning state. Specter has been increasingly isolated within his progressively more extremist party for his willingness to cross party lines, and finally found the Democrats more to his liking. Once  Al Franken, the apparent winner in Minnesota, is finally seated, Specter will become the 60th Democrat. In his new position, he will wield immediate power, as his vote will be the one that makes any bill filibuster-proof. He never voted the strict party line as a Republican, and he is unlikely to as a Democrat. This gives him the ability to be a moderating influence on his new party. Ironically, by switching parties, he may actually be doing the Republicans a favor.

The First Puppy

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

stei090414

We seem to live in two completely separate worlds these days–the one inhabited by most of us and the one peopled by the right-wing bloviators. In the first one, Obama is still in the honeymoon period, feeling his way, creating the tenor of his presidency, trying his best to address the many complex issues of the day, with some successes and some failures. I’m not happy with the way his administration has addressed the economic crisis, and I wonder if he was perhaps too timid in his European trip. That said, in this world, it is simply too soon to assess his effectiveness. In the other world, the world of the perpetually enraged shouting heads, everything he does is an unparalleled catastrophe, a signal failure of will, imagination, philosophy and intelligence, devoid of any redeeming qualities.